Friday, May 27, 2005
Children and the American Dream
I just went to see “Return to Neverland,” a movie starring Johnny Depp as J.M. Barrie, the creator of the children’s classic, “Peter Pan.” Depp presents Barrie as a lonely dreamer, misunderstood by his chilly and socially ambitious wife. Barrie’s friendship with a young family he meets in a London park blossoms as he tells the sons marvelous stories of pirates and adventure. Their imaginative games together help Barrie break through writer’s block and he develops the plot of his whimsical play.
The movie reminds us how ideas about childhood have changed over time. It’s hard to recall now that Barrie’s play was originally performed for an adult audience, though it’s now shelved in libraries as children’s literature. It’s hard, too, to watch this version of Barrie’s relationship with the Llewellyn Davies boys and their yummy mummy, Kate Winslet, without a queasy expectation that some sexual subplot is about to be forced upon us. Particularly as the trial of that other Lost Boy, Michael Jackson, grinds to its tragic last act in today’s papers.
The literary critic Jacqueline Rose has argued that so-called children’s literature, like Peter Pan, often tells us more about adults and their fantasies than it does about children themselves. The same may be true of social policies and news reports, which evoke the figures of The Child Left Behind or the Urban Teen Mom to personify and focus cultural anxieties.
The very idea of childhood as a distinctive phase of life was invented sometime in seventeenth century Europe. Cultural traditions place different significances on the continuum of human changes from birth to death. Shakespeare, for instance, divides the life of Man into Seven Ages: from mewling and puking infant to lean and slippered Pantaloon, but says nothing about teens, tweens or empty-nesters. These divisions carry with them moral ideas: the Puritans saw the infant as liable to willful wickedness; Rousseau saw the child as naturally good, to be protected from culture’s corrupting forces.
Contemporary American culture seems to be in two minds about children: there’s a great split between what we know on the basis of science and what we want to believe about children’s lives. One source for current data about how children in St Joe County are faring from birth to age five is a report commissioned by the Community Foundation and United Way of St Joseph County, written by Sue Christenson and Ann Rosen. The report will be coming out soon in the public libraries.
The report lays out the contradictions in our attitude to children. On the one hand, we declare that No Child must be Left Behind, yet we know that in St Joe County, about 18% of children under five live below the poverty line. Half of African-American children under five and one third of Latino children under five live below poverty. We think all children should have the opportunity to achieve the American Dream, yet we know that economic disadvantage is correlated with lesser success in school.
Again, we know that the first years of life are crucial to children’s cognitive and emotional development, yet we do not require that all childcare workers be highly qualified. Indeed, 18 daycare centers and ministries in St Joe County lack a single teacher with a bachelor’s degree. We insist that children in day care centers be protected by a slew of licensing rules, but waive many of those rules for Hoosier children who happen to be at religiously-affiliated ministries. Children are precious and vulnerable, but we pay those who take care of children in our local neighbourhoods poverty wages.
Of course, now that we have this report, our community faces a challenge. Surely, every story for and about children should have a happy ending?
Clap your hands if you believe in fairies!
Books & Films • Education • Permalink • Printer Friendly
A random selection from more than 300 Michiana Chronicles -- refresh the browser to see another set:
Joe Chaney -- More essays by Joe
Louise Collins -- Children and the American Dream / More essays by Louise
April Lidinsky -- More essays by April
Jonathan Nashel -- More essays by Jonathan
Jeff Nixa -- More essays by Jeff
Ken Smith -- More essays by Ken
Jeanette Saddler Taylor -- More essays by Jeanette
