Friday, July 06, 2007
Pleasure and Danger … and Gender
Here we are in the thick of summer. For the kids in our neighborhood – boys and girls alike – it’s a time for dirt, backyard firepits and pointy sticks, skateboard-skinned knees and other hazardous delights. How fascinating and strange, then, to have the gender of these dangerous pleasures thrust in our faces this summer, with two pop culture artifacts. One is the wildly best-selling how-to volume, The Dangerous Book for Boys, and the other is the unsettling throwback movie Nancy Drew. Together they take a nostalgic, or maybe just backward, look at boys and girls and the ways they play.
The Dangerous Book for Boys, piled high in every bookstore, is a runaway best-seller, with mid-life men making up a fat slice of the purchasing public. The volume caters to early 20th century nostalgia, with a gorgeous red cover, antique lettering, and marbled binding that evoke Robert Baden-Powell’s 1908 Scouting for Boys. That manual, and many “Boys Own” magazines, came out in a time when gender roles were shifting, and anxious turf-guarding was the result. A hundred years later, turf-guarding is back, even though the activities in The Dangerous Book for Boys will appeal to any kid with curiosity and spunk. Do paper airplanes have a gender, after all? How about secret codes, tree-houses and crystal-growing? This is cool, cool stuff and my middle-school daughters found it plenty strange that somehow it’s “Girls Not Allowed” territory.
Gender nostalgia is also weirdly at work in the new Nancy Drew movie, to which I brought my own childhood baggage of voracious reading. The movie strips away much of what was appealing about the series. Nancy’s two girlfriends, George and Bess, who are essential to the girl-power book plots, are jettisoned in the movie’s opening scene. Despite the fact that this Nancy attends an updated, Paris Hilton-flavored Hollywood high school, the movie evokes an idealized past, with opening and closing credits featuring the distinctive line-drawings from the 1930s volumes. Where the books and the film clearly agree, though, is that what makes Nancy Drew appealing is not that any girl could be her, but that she is the exception we could never be.
She has fantasy fiction’s requisite absent mother, a father rich and busy enough to give her a convertible and get out of the way, and a housekeeper who provides home-baked snacks but never nags. Unlike the boys’ “how to” manuals, whose premise is, “Here’s stuff any boy can do!” the dangerous stuff Nancy Drew does is only possible for girls under the unique circumstances of fantasy. After all, the danger Nancy Drew gets into puts to shame the so-called Dangerous Book for Boys, with its paper water-bombs and tips for skipping stones. Big whoop. You want to talk danger? In the book series, Nancy Drew gets drugged, knocked out, tied up, trapped – all by adults, and mostly men, who do pose a danger to girls in real life ... but in the books Nancy always triumphs. Sadly, that’s what makes it fiction.
Oddly, the main nostalgia in the movie is for her fashion sense; along the way Nancy converts the Hollywood High girls to Campbell plaid skirts and penny loafers. Since her adventurous life is purely fantasy, ultimately, girls are left to long only for modest things they can wear, as opposed to the fun things boys get to do. What would a “Dangerous Book for Girls” look like – what do girls have to be nostalgic about? Housework? Diaper changing?
In fact, HarperCollins is coming out with The Daring Book for Girls this October, and I’m mighty curious to see how this book will package girls’ history. The messages in this summer’s movies are clear about who gets to have fun. My 10-year-old instantly picked up on the fact that in the penguin action movie, Surf’s Up, only boys enter the big competition, and the two female characters are a fussy, discouraging mother and a gentle-voiced lifeguard who spends her time saving boys from themselves. Gee, what fun! Even Ratatouille, which is filled with underdog ... er, under-rodent charm, serves up a female character only as a side-dish. Maybe this is the appeal of Harry Potter – at least a girl is essentially in the mix, and the pleasure of danger, as well as the sweetness of friendship, knows no gender boundaries.
Fantasies about times gone by can tell us plenty about current politics. There are real dangers for girls that don’t warrant nostalgia. And there’s little to long for when we conjure the female past. I guess that leaves the future, eh? In these long summer days, when it comes to reinventing what it means to be a kid - of any gender – there’s no time like the present. Ready to get dirty?
Books & Films • Customs & Rituals • Sports & Recreation • Women & Men • Permalink • Printer Friendly
A random selection from more than 300 Michiana Chronicles -- refresh the browser to see another set:
Joe Chaney -- More essays by Joe
Louise Collins -- More essays by Louise
April Lidinsky -- Pleasure and Danger … and Gender / More essays by April
Jonathan Nashel -- More essays by Jonathan
Jeff Nixa -- More essays by Jeff
Ken Smith -- More essays by Ken
Jeanette Saddler Taylor -- More essays by Jeanette
